Opinion
21-1174
07-22-2021
Deafueh Monbo, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anthony Damiano, SHAW, MORROW & JOSEPH, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Michael Kevin Wiggins, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT &KLEIN, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Benjamin Skipp Harvey, KIERNAN TREBACH, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Carolyn Israel Stein, CAROLYN STEIN, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 20, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00004-CCB)
Deafueh Monbo, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Anthony Damiano, SHAW, MORROW & JOSEPH, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Michael Kevin Wiggins, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT &KLEIN, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Benjamin Skipp Harvey, KIERNAN TREBACH, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Carolyn Israel Stein, CAROLYN STEIN, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Deafueh Monbo seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion for recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Monbo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Vuono v. United States, 441 F.2d 271, 272 (4th Cir. 1971). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED