From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monarch Manufacturing Company v. Greenwood

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 11, 1929
30 F.2d 548 (3d Cir. 1929)

Opinion

No. 3908.

January 11, 1929.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Bodine, Judge.

For opinion below, see 30 F.2d 547.

Drury W. Cooper and Thomas J. Byrne, both of New York City, for appellants.

Charles Neave, of New York City, Harrison F. Lyman, of Boston, Mass., Arthur William Nelson, of Chicago, Ill., and Henry R. Ashton, of New York City, for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


This case involves no legal questions or principles; the decisive issue being whether the patent involved invention. The patent was thoroughly discussed by Judge Bodine, and his reasons for holding it valid and infringed are summarized in his opinion. Finding ourselves in accord with the conclusion he reached, a further discussion by this court would simply be an effort to put in different language what he has already so well said. We therefore limit ourselves to affirming the decree on his opinion.


Summaries of

Monarch Manufacturing Company v. Greenwood

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 11, 1929
30 F.2d 548 (3d Cir. 1929)
Case details for

Monarch Manufacturing Company v. Greenwood

Case Details

Full title:MONARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Gardner Fibre Company…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 1929

Citations

30 F.2d 548 (3d Cir. 1929)