Monakino v. State

Full title: Blake Anthony Monakino v. The State of Texas

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Cause number: 01-14-00361-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-14-00361-CR

06-28-2016

Blake Anthony Monakino v. The State of Texas

Evelyn V. Keyes

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Type of motions: Letter-Motions to Remand and to Withdraw Appellate Attorney Party filing motions: Pro Se Appellant Document to be filed: N/A Is appeal accelerated? No. Ordered that motions are:

[ ] Granted
[ ] Denied
[v] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[v] Other: __________
Because appellant is represented by counsel, his pro se letter-motions to remand to the trial court for time served, filed on June 14, 2016, and to withdraw his appellate attorney, filed on June 15, 2016, are DISMISSED as moot. See Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (no entitlement to hybrid representation). Appellant is directed to communicate directly with his counsel, Melissa Martin.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually Date: June 28, 2016 November 7, 2008 Revision