From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monacelli v. Armstrong, Chili Fire Department

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 24, 1980
406 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued March 27, 1980

Decided April 24, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, ROBERT J. McDOWELL, J.

Leon Katzen for appellants in Action No. 1.

John R. Schwartz for appellants in Action No. 2.

Henry R. Ippolito for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice REID S. MOULE insofar as that opinion relates to the defendants Van Gelder and the Chili Fire Department.

As there was no showing of negligence, proximate cause, or foreseeability, summary judgment was properly granted to these defendants.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Monacelli v. Armstrong, Chili Fire Department

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 24, 1980
406 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Monacelli v. Armstrong, Chili Fire Department

Case Details

Full title:DAVID R. MONACELLI, by His Guardian ad Litem, EVA J. ADAMS, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 24, 1980

Citations

406 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1980)
406 N.E.2d 804
428 N.Y.S.2d 949

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Both

A nuisance based on negligence is but a single wrong, whether characterized as negligence or nuisance.…

Brown v. Town of Cincinnatus

The parade organizers directed all parade participants to Deerpath Lane for the purpose of safely disbanding…