From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molloy v. Molloy

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 29, 2002
466 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2002)

Opinion

No. 120096.

April 29, 2002.


COA: 224179, Wayne CC: 98-835819 DM

On order of the Court, the Court having granted leave to appeal and heard oral argument in this matter, we ORDER as follows: we AFFIRM the decision of the Court of Appeals with the exception of Section III. We VACATE that section and any other statement in the opinion insofar as it holds that all future in camera interviews with children in custody cases "shall be recorded." We are unable to determine on the present record whether Const 1963, art 1, § 17 or U.S. Const, amd XIV, § 1 mandate such a requirement. Accordingly, and coincident with this order, this Court is opening an administrative file to examine the extent to which, and the procedures by which, in camera testimony may be taken in custody cases. Persons interested in addressing the Court regarding this matter should refer to Administrative File No. 02-13. This case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, consistent with the decision of the Court of Appeals.


Summaries of

Molloy v. Molloy

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 29, 2002
466 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2002)
Case details for

Molloy v. Molloy

Case Details

Full title:PETER MOLLOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WENDY MOLLOY, Defendant-Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 29, 2002

Citations

466 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2002)
643 N.W.2d 574

Citing Cases

Tafe v. McClenton

Further, there is no requirement that the in camera interview be recorded for later scrutiny. Molloy v…

Morin v. Fye

To the extent we have considered the argument, we conclude that it lacks legal merit because our Supreme…