From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molka Wines Co., Inc., v. Rosenthal

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Mar 26, 1936
160 Misc. 805 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)

Opinion

March 26, 1936.

A. Robert Teichner, for the plaintiff.

Maurice Shapiro, for the defendant.



Plaintiff claims a right to the trade name "Banner" in connection with the bottling and sale of wine, and the claim is predicated upon the user of that name after a concern called the Continental Food Products Co., Inc., had been adjudged a bankrupt and its tangible assets sold by its receiver. Plaintiff now seeks to enjoin the defendants from the use of the trade name "Banner." One of the defendants purchased from the trustee in bankruptcy of the Continental Food Products Co., Inc., subsequent to the time when the receiver had sold the tangible assets, the trade name "Banner," and claims by virtue of such purchase the exclusive right to use that name. There can be no question but that at the time of the sale by the trustee and the purchase by the defendant of the trade name "Banner" the Continental Food Products Co., Inc., had ceased to do business. The acquisition of the trade name "Banner" disassociated with any going business conveys no title to its use. ( Matter of Jaysee Corset Co., 201 F. 779.) Plaintiff apparently acquired the rights to the name by a user subsequent to the time when it must be deemed to have been abandoned by the Continental Food Products Co., Inc., and prior in time to any user by the defendants. Accordingly plaintiff would seem to be entitled to the relief prayed for.


Summaries of

Molka Wines Co., Inc., v. Rosenthal

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Mar 26, 1936
160 Misc. 805 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)
Case details for

Molka Wines Co., Inc., v. Rosenthal

Case Details

Full title:MOLKA WINES CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. HERMAN L. ROSENTHAL and Others…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Mar 26, 1936

Citations

160 Misc. 805 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)
290 N.Y.S. 717

Citing Cases

Sayles Biltmore Bleach. v. Narr. Supply

It is true that a trade-mark or name may be assigned, but only if it remains associated with the product or…

Molka Wines Co., Inc. v. Rosenthal

October 16, 1936. Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, O'Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ. [ 160 Misc. 805.]…