From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molinoff v. Kates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2003
302 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-10110

Submitted January 28, 2003.

February 24, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), dated October 15, 2001, as, after a nonjury trial, in effect, dismissed his second cause of action to recover damages for fraud.

Daniel D. Molinoff, Larchmont, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the trial court properly dismissed his cause of action alleging fraud upon finding that he failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant fraudulently induced him to discount the principal balance due on the loan at issue (see Fraga v. Toshiba Am. Med. Sys., 298 A.D.2d 427; Abrahami v. UPC Constr. Co., 224 A.D.2d 231).

ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Molinoff v. Kates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2003
302 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Molinoff v. Kates

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL D. MOLINOFF, appellant, v. STEVEN KATES, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 633