From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molinaro v. DataX, Ltd.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 20, 2022
2:21-cv-02142-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02142-JCM-EJY

01-20-2022

JAMES MOLINARO, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD., Defendant.

GIA N. MARINA Nevada Bar No. 15276 CLARK HILL PLLC Attorney for Defendant DataX, Ltd. David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 Shawn Miller, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7825 KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff


GIA N. MARINA Nevada Bar No. 15276 CLARK HILL PLLC Attorney for Defendant DataX, Ltd.

David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 Shawn Miller, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7825 KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DATAX, LTD TO FILE ANSWER

SECOND REQUEST

Defendant DataX, Ltd. (“DataX”) has requested an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter, to which Plaintiff has no opposition. Accordingly, pursuant to LR IA 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and among counsel, that DataX's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended from January 24, 2021 through and including February 23, 2022. The request . . . . . . was made by DataX so that the parties may have additional time to engage in settlement discussion, and Plaintiff approves. This stipulation is filed in good faith and not intended to cause delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Molinaro v. DataX, Ltd.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 20, 2022
2:21-cv-02142-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Molinaro v. DataX, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MOLINARO, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02142-JCM-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 20, 2022)