Opinion
April 27, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered August 23, 1999, which, in this personal injury action, granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint to increase the ad damnum and for an order transferring this action from Civil Court to Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Kenneth Marder, for plaintiffs-respondents.
Mary Y.J. Kim, for defendants-appellants.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., ELLERIN, LERNER, RUBIN, ANDRIAS, JJ.
In the absence of prejudice to the defendant, a motion to amend the ad damnum clause should generally be granted (Loomis v. Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 N.Y.2d 18, 21-22; Sahdala v. New York City Health Hosp. Corp., 251 A.D.2d 70). Accordingly, as no prejudice attributable to the amendment proposed by plaintiffs was shown by defendants, the motion court's grant of the requested relief should be affirmed. We have reviewed defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.