From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molina v. Davey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 3, 2016
658 F. App'x 331 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-15078

10-03-2016

MATTHEW A. MOLINA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DAVE DAVEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01926-LKK MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

California state prisoner Matthew A. Molina appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust, see Rhoades v. Henry, 638 F.3d 1027, 1034 (9th Cir. 2010), and we vacate and remand.

Molina contends that the district court erred in dismissing his habeas petition as unexhausted because it had discretion to stay the proceedings. After the district court dismissed Molina's petition, this court held in Mena v. Long, 813 F.3d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 2016), that a "district court has the discretion to stay and hold in abeyance fully unexhausted petitions under the circumstances set forth in Rhines [v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005)]." We, therefore, vacate and remand for the district court to determine in the first instance whether Molina is entitled to a stay and for any further proceedings.

Molina's unopposed request for judicial notice of state court records is granted.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Molina v. Davey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 3, 2016
658 F. App'x 331 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Molina v. Davey

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW A. MOLINA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DAVE DAVEY, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

658 F. App'x 331 (9th Cir. 2016)