From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moles v. Saul

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
1:20-cv-0906 JLT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-0906 JLT

06-15-2021

WENDELL MOLES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER REMANDING THE MATTER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, WENDELL MOLES, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 14, 2021, the parties stipulated to a voluntary remand pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 17.) Pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, an ALJ shall “reassess Plaintiff's subjective statements, ” complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. (Id. at 2.) Further, the parties stipulated that judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff. (Id.) Based upon the terms of the stipulation, the Court ORDERS:

1. The matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Wendell Moles and against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moles v. Saul

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
1:20-cv-0906 JLT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Moles v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:WENDELL MOLES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-0906 JLT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)