From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mole v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 17, 2022
871 S.E.2d 815 (N.C. 2022)

Opinion

394PA21-1

05-17-2022

MOLE v. CITY OF DURHAM

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, For Mole, Michael. M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Mole, Michael. Henry W. Sappenfield, Attorney at Law, Durham, For The City of Durham. Michele L. Livingstone, Attorney at Law, For The City of Durham. Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police. Caitlin H. Walton, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.


J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, For Mole, Michael.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Mole, Michael.

Henry W. Sappenfield, Attorney at Law, Durham, For The City of Durham.

Michele L. Livingstone, Attorney at Law, For The City of Durham.

Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

Caitlin H. Walton, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of May 2022 by National Fraternal Order of Police and the State of North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of May 2022."


Summaries of

Mole v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 17, 2022
871 S.E.2d 815 (N.C. 2022)
Case details for

Mole v. City of Durham

Case Details

Full title:MOLE v. CITY OF DURHAM

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: May 17, 2022

Citations

871 S.E.2d 815 (N.C. 2022)