From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mok Chung v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 10, 1904
133 F. 166 (9th Cir. 1904)

Opinion


133 F. 166 (9th Cir. 1904) MOK CHUNG v. UNITED STATES. No. 830. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 10, 1904

George A. McGowan, for appellant.

Marshall B. Woodworth, U.S. Atty.

Before GILBERT, ROSS and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

Page 167.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

Mok Chung, a Chinaman, arrived at the port of San Francisco on the steamship San Jose, and applied to the collector of the port of San Francisco for permission to land, on the ground that he was a native-born citizen of the United States. Upon a hearing had before the collector of the port, his application was denied. He thereupon sued out a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that he was a native-born citizen of the United States. Upon a hearing had upon that writ, and the return thereto, and the evidence taken, the court found the petition to be a subject of the empire of China, and not entitled to land in the United States, and ordered him deported. From that judgment an appeal was taken to this court.

The appellee now moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the District Court had no jurisdiction to issue the writ of habeas corpus for the reason that the appellant had taken no appeal to the Secretary of Commerce and Labor from the decision of the collector of the port of San Francisco denying his right to land. On the authority of San Francisco denying his right to land. On the authority of United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U.S. 161, 24 Sup.Ct. 621, 48 L.Ed. 917, the motion is overruled, but the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Mok Chung v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 10, 1904
133 F. 166 (9th Cir. 1904)
Case details for

Mok Chung v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MOK CHUNG v. UNITED STATES.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 10, 1904

Citations

133 F. 166 (9th Cir. 1904)

Citing Cases

Ying v. United States

Upon motion of Marshall B. Woodworth, U.S. Atty., appeal dismissed, upon authority of opinion in case No.…