Opinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Before WARDLAW, PAEZ, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Christina Mojica petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals that she is ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1) because she has not demonstrated that her removal would cause "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" to a qualifying relative under § 1229b(b)(1)(D).
Page 636.
We lack jurisdiction to review Mojica's petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 249 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir.2001).
Her request to extend the temporary stay of execution of the removal order pending review by this Court is mooted by this disposition. The stay will be vacated upon issuance of the mandate in this case.
DISMISSED.