From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohammed v. Banks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 28, 2011
CV 10-8499-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion


OMAR MOHAMMED, Petitioner, v. TERESER A. BANKS, Respondent. No. CV 10-8499-VAP (AGR) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 28, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Mohammed v. Banks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 28, 2011
CV 10-8499-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Mohammed v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:OMAR MOHAMMED, Petitioner, v. TERESER A. BANKS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

CV 10-8499-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)