Opinion
23-2219
07-25-2024
SHENISA MOHAMMED, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MICHAEL S. HENRY [ARGUED] HENRY & GROGAN COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER JACLYN G. HAGNER [ARGUED] UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
Argued March 5, 2024
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration (BIA 1: A089-149-340) Immigration Judge: Brian T. Palmer
MICHAEL S. HENRY [ARGUED] HENRY & GROGAN COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
JACLYN G. HAGNER [ARGUED] UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT
Before: JORDAN, PORTER, and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges
OPINION [*]
JORDAN, Circuit Judge
Shenisa Mohammed received a Notice to Appear ("NTA") in the Immigration Court in Cleveland, Ohio, and the NTA was filed and docketed in that Court. Following a hearing, which Mohammed attended virtually from the Moshannon Valley Correctional Center in Philipsburg, Pennsylvania, where she was detained, and the Immigration Judge ("IJ") conducted virtually while physically present in Virginia, the IJ ordered that Mohammed be removed from the country.
For the reasons discussed in Castillo v. Attorney General of the United States, Case Nos. 23-2123, 23-2800, &23-3136, we hold that judicial venue under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2) lies in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Accordingly, we will transfer Shenisa Mohammed's petition to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
[*] This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and, pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7, does not constitute binding precedent.