From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohamed v. Wash. State Human Rights Comm'n

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 4, 2023
No. C22-1011JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

C22-1011JHC

01-04-2023

BASRA D. MOHAMED, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 requires a plaintiff to serve the defendant with a summons and a copy of the plaintiff's complaint and sets forth the specific requirements for doing so. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4. Rule 4(m), which provides the timeframe in which service must be effectuated, states in relevant part:

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.
Id. Here, Plaintiff has failed to serve Defendant with a summons and a copy of Plaintiff's complaint within the timeframe provided in Rule 4(m).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within ten (10) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4(m). If Plaintiff does not demonstrate good cause for the failure, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Mohamed v. Wash. State Human Rights Comm'n

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 4, 2023
No. C22-1011JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Mohamed v. Wash. State Human Rights Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:BASRA D. MOHAMED, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

No. C22-1011JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2023)