From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mofson v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1998
250 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 18, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, by awarding the plaintiff the principal sums of $300,000 for past pain and suffering and $150,000 for future pain and suffering; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

The court did not err in issuing a missing-witness charge regarding an employee of the defendant who was not called to testify ( see, People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424; Jasmin v. Raju, 231 A.D.2d 605).

Although the plaintiff is a respondent on this appeal, his stipulation to accept the trial court's reduction of the damage awards entitles him to request full or partial reinstatement up to the sum voted by the jury ( see, CPLR 5501 [a] [5]; Papa v. City of New York, 194 A.D.2d 527). The awards are increased to the extent indicated herein.

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.

Friedmann, J.P., Goldstein, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mofson v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1998
250 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Mofson v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL MOFSON, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 996

Citing Cases

Morales v. Davidson Apartments, LLC

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the testimony of the plaintiff's expert at the trial on the issue of…

Fertik v. Fertik

On that day a sign language interpreter was available for the plaintiff, who is deaf, after extensive efforts…