From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moffatt v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1897
22 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

November Term, 1897.


Judgment of County Court reversed, and that of the justice modified, by striking therefrom the direction that the complaint be dismissed on the merits, and as modified, affirmed, without costs in the County Court or of this appeal.


We are of opinion that the plaintiff would have made out a good case had he proved that the contractor who built the defendant's house was still indebted to him (the plaintiff) for materials furnished. This he failed to do. To constitute an equitable assignment, a valuable consideration is essential and indispensable. ( Shaw v. Tonns, 20 App. Div. 39.) The justice was, therefore, right in dismissing the complaint. The case, however, was simply one of failure of proof, and the judgment, so far as it directed that the complaint be dismissed on the merits, was improper. The judgment of the County Court should be reversed, and the judgment of the Justice's Court modified by striking therefrom the direction that the complaint be dismissed on the merits, and as modified, affirmed, without costs in the County Court or of this appeal. All concurred.


Summaries of

Moffatt v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1897
22 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Moffatt v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence Moffatt, Respondent, v. Howard N. Bailey, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1897

Citations

22 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)