Opinion
April 10, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted the defendant leave to enter a default judgment on its counterclaims is dismissed as academic; and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal relating to that part of the order which granted the defendant leave to enter a default judgment on its counterclaims is dismissed as academic since the default in replying to the counterclaims was vacated by a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered October 26, 1988.
We find that the fourth and fifth counterclaims against the additional counterclaim defendant, as escrowee, stated causes of action and therefore the Supreme Court properly denied his cross motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see, Guggenheimer v. Ginzburg, 43 N.Y.2d 268, 274). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.