From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moehrig v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 31, 2005
No. 03-03-00756-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2005)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00756-CR

Filed: August 31, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Comal County, 22nd Judicial District, No. CR2002-393, Honorable Charles R. Ramsay, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PATTERSON and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


A jury found appellant Gregory Alan Moehrig guilty of unlawfully possessing a firearm. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 46.04(a)(1) (West Supp. 2004-05). The court assessed a ten-year prison sentence. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Moehrig v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 31, 2005
No. 03-03-00756-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2005)
Case details for

Moehrig v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ALAN MOEHRIG, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 31, 2005

Citations

No. 03-03-00756-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2005)