From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moe v. University of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 5, 2009
773 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. 2009)

Opinion

No. A09-958.

October 5, 2009.

Richard C. Lund, Law Offices of Donald F. Noack, Jr., Mound, MN, for respondent.

Roderick C. Cosgriff, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff Johnson, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 27, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice

PAGE and GILDEA, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Moe v. University of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 5, 2009
773 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. 2009)
Case details for

Moe v. University of Minnesota

Case Details

Full title:Janet L. MOE, Respondent, v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 5, 2009

Citations

773 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. 2009)