Modern Maid Homes, Inc. v. Parnell

3 Citing cases

  1. Allen v. Lankford

    317 S.E.2d 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 5 times

    However, because genuine issues of material fact remain, the trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion for summary judgment. See Barber Barber v. Board of Comm., 231 Ga. 574, 575 (3) ( 203 S.E.2d 192) (1974); Modern Maid Homes v. Parnell, 129 Ga. App. 576 ( 200 S.E.2d 320) (1973). Judgment reversed in part and affirmed in part.

  2. Royall-Ackerman, Inc. v. Blackwell

    203 S.E.2d 925 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

    "There being material issues of fact and the evidence adduced not demanding a finding for the defendant, the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for summary judgment." Modern Maid Homes v. Parnell, 129 Ga. App. 576 ( 200 S.E.2d 320). Judgment affirmed. Hall, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

  3. Knox v. Stone

    204 S.E.2d 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

    "There being material issues of fact and the evidence adduced not demanding a finding for the defendant, the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for summary judgment." Modern Maid Homes v. Parnell, 129 Ga. App. 576 ( 200 S.E.2d 320). Judgment affirmed. Hall, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.