From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Modanlo v. Rose

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 19, 2019
No. 19-1431 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1431

12-19-2019

NADER MODANLO, Claimant - Appellant, v. CHERYL E. ROSE, Trustee - Appellee, and FINAL ANALYSIS, INCORPORATED, Debtor.

Nader Modanlo, Appellant Pro Se. James Martin Hoffman, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02544-PWG) Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nader Modanlo, Appellant Pro Se. James Martin Hoffman, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nader Modanlo appeals from the district court's orders: (1) dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court's order approving a final application for attorney's fees, and (2) denying Modanlo's Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the parties' briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Modanlo v. Rose, No. 8:17-cv-02544-PWG (D. Md. July 2, 2018; Mar. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Modanlo v. Rose

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 19, 2019
No. 19-1431 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Modanlo v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:NADER MODANLO, Claimant - Appellant, v. CHERYL E. ROSE, Trustee …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 19, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1431 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2019)