From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moccia v. Weisfogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1998
253 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 21, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the defendants established the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship, and that the former and current representation are both adverse and substantially related, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in disqualifying the plaintiffs' law firm from further representation of the plaintiffs ( see, Solow v. Grace Co., 83 N.Y.2d 303, 308; Mondello v. Mondello, 118 A.D.2d 549; Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp., 101 A.D.2d 268).

Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moccia v. Weisfogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1998
253 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Moccia v. Weisfogel

Case Details

Full title:NANCY MOCCIA et al., Appellants, v. ESTHER WEISFOGEL et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 503

Citing Cases

Town of Oyster Bay v. 55 Motor Ave. Co.

nated confidential information in connection with his former representation of the appellants, they are…

Astor Rhinebeck Associates, LLC v. Town of Rhinebeck

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The disqualification of an attorney is a matter which rests…