From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mobley v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 8, 2017
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-14-0035 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-14-0035

08-08-2017

GERRY MOBLEY JR., Plaintiff v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants


() (Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab)

MEMORANDUM

The magistrate judge has filed a report and recommendation to which no objections have been filed. In reviewing a magistrate judge's report, the court must conduct a de novo review of those portions to which objections are made. Snyder v. Bender, 548 F. App'x 767, 770 (3d Cir. 2013)(nonprecedential)(citing Goney v. Clark, 749 F.2d 5, 7 (3d Cir. 1984); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Where no party has objected, the court only needs to review the report for clear error or manifest injustice. See Smith v. Lindsey, No. 13-CV-2914, 2015 WL 136639, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 7, 2015)(Caldwell, J.). We have reviewed the report and find no clear error or manifest injustice.

We will issue an appropriate order.

/s/William W. Caldwell

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge Date: August 8, 2017


Summaries of

Mobley v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 8, 2017
CIVIL NO. 1:CV-14-0035 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Mobley v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:GERRY MOBLEY JR., Plaintiff v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 8, 2017

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-14-0035 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2017)