And a trial court does not err by giving a curative instruction in its closing jury charge rather than contemporaneous with the introduction of the improper testimony, when there was no request for such an instruction at the time the testimony was elicited. See Mobley v. State, 235 Ga.App. 151, 152, 508 S.E.2d 778 (1998). Furthermore, after hearing the prosecutor's concern that the giving of a curative instruction in isolation would only emphasize the error, we cannot say that the trial court acted outside its broad discretion in determining that the most subtle way of dealing with the improper testimony was to give a curative instruction embedded within the closing jury charge.