Mobile Tech. v. Sennco Sols.

Full title: MOBILE TECH, INC., Appellant v. SENNCO SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 2020

2019-1937 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2020)

Opinion

2019-1937

04-20-2020

MOBILE TECH, INC., Appellant v. SENNCO SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee

ALAN H. NORMAN, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTHONY F. BLUM, MATTHEW A. BRAUNEL, DAVID B. JINKINS, JONATHAN G. MUSCH. HUGH S. BALSAM, Locke Lord LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN DAVID ERICKSON, Pauley Erickson & Kottis, Hoffman Estates, IL.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-02200.

JUDGMENT

ALAN H. NORMAN, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTHONY F. BLUM, MATTHEW A. BRAUNEL, DAVID B. JINKINS, JONATHAN G. MUSCH. HUGH S. BALSAM, Locke Lord LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN DAVID ERICKSON, Pauley Erickson & Kottis, Hoffman Estates, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 20, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court