Opinion
18691-22
08-14-2023
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
On March 13, 2023, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the grounds that no notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, or notice of determination concerning collection action pursuant to section 6320 and/or 6330, I.R.C., had been sent to petitioner with respect to taxable years 2019, 2020, 2021, or any other tax year, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to petitioner's tax years that would confer jurisdiction on the Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioner to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioner has failed to do so.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that petitioner's Motion To Proceed Remotely, filed September 6, 2022, is denied as moot.