From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moak v. Mehlman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 13, 1945
185 Misc. 992 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

Opinion

December 13, 1945.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, CARROLL, J.

Samuel Roth for appellant.

Abraham Solomon for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


Under the facts presented in this case, a fair interpretation of the landlord's use, would include that of the daughter. It was error, therefore, for the court to dismiss the petition at the end of the landlord's case.

The final order should be unanimously reversed, upon the law, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to the landlord to abide the event.

MacCRATE, SMITH and STEINBRINK, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Moak v. Mehlman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 13, 1945
185 Misc. 992 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
Case details for

Moak v. Mehlman

Case Details

Full title:ROSE MOAK, Landlord, Appellant, v. MILTON MEHLMAN, Tenant, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1945

Citations

185 Misc. 992 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
60 N.Y.S.2d 569

Citing Cases

Ritacco v. Morris

The application of that doctrine is limited to actual determination in respect to litigated and necessarily…

Matter of Prete v. Finkelstein

The Federal rent regulations provided that a landlord was entitled to recover possession of living…