From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moaec, Inc. v. Musicip Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 18, 2008
07-cv-654-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 18, 2008)

Opinion

07-cv-654-bbc.

June 18, 2008


ORDER


This court recently revised its claims construction procedure and is applying the new procedure retroactively in all patent cases in which the first claims construction brief has not been filed with the court. The claims construction hearing previously set in this case is stricken but can be reinstated if the parties persuade the court that a hearing actually is necessary. Although the briefing dates have not changed, the contents of the briefs has:

Motions Requesting Construction: July 11, 2008

Not later than the date set forth above, any party may file and serve a motion requesting that the court construe specified terms. The party must submit each of its proposed constructions and all documentary support for its proposals. Additionally, it is the party's burden to persuade the court that construction of each specified term is necessary to resolve a disputed issue concerning infringement or invalidity. If the moving party wants a claims construction hearing, then it must request one, specify which terms require a hearing and provide grounds why a hearing actually is necessary for each specified term.

Responses: August 1, 2008

Not later than the date set forth above, a party must file and serve any objections to an opponent's motion requesting claims construction, including any objection to the opponent's proposed method of construction.


Summaries of

Moaec, Inc. v. Musicip Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 18, 2008
07-cv-654-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Moaec, Inc. v. Musicip Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MOAEC, INC., Plaintiff, v. MUSICIP CORPORATION, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 18, 2008

Citations

07-cv-654-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 18, 2008)