From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MMCA GROUP, LTD. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Feb 20, 2009
Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC).

February 20, 2009

Frederick J. Geonetta (Cal. Bar No. 114824), Thomas Marc Litton (Cal. Bar No. 119985), LITTON GEONETTA, LLP, San Francisco, CA.

Kenneth N. Frucht, (Cal. Bar No. 178881), LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH FRUCHT, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff MMCA Group, Ltd.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL


Plaintiff MMCA filed an administrative motion to file documents under seal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(c), Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and the Stipulated Protective Order ("Protective Order") on January 30, 2009, in conjunction with filing its opposition to Defendant PICA's motion for summary judgment.

On February 9, 2009, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff's motion in part and denying it in part. The Court denied Plaintiff's motion with respect to Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Robert Creswell, Exhibits 2-5 and 8-12 to the Declaration of Thomas Byrne, Exhibits 1-4 and 12-13 of the Declaration of Fredereick Geonetta, Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jorge Barahona, and the Declaration of Frederick Geonetta in Opposition to Defendant PICA's Motion for Summary Judgment. Pursuant to the Court's Order, Plaintiff was given leave to file a renewed Administrative Motion to Seal certain of these documents.

Plaintiff has filed Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Robert Creswell, Exhibits 2-5 and 9-12 to the Declaration of Thomas Byrne, and Exhibits 1-4 and 12-13 of the Declaration of Fredereick Geonetta in the public record. Plaintiff has also filed a Renewed Administrative Motion to Seal as to Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Thomas Byrne, Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jorge Barahona, and the Declaration of Frederick Geonetta in Opposition to Defendant PICA's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has considered MMCA's Renewed Motion and the Declaration of Kenneth Frucht submitted in support of said motion, and finds good cause to seal the documents that MMCA has requested be sealed. Therefore, the Clerk shall file under seal the above referenced documents.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MMCA GROUP, LTD. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Feb 20, 2009
Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2009)
Case details for

MMCA GROUP, LTD. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:MMCA GROUP, LTD., a Virginia corporation, Plaintiff v. HEWLETT-PACKARD…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Feb 20, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2009)