From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MMA CAPITAL CORPORATION v. CROWDER

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Apr 21, 2010
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-2392-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO: 8:09-cv-2392-T-23TBM.

April 21, 2010


ORDER


A March 25, 2010, order (Doc. 17) grants the plaintiff until May 28, 2010, to effect service on the defendant Robert A. Crowder. Although presenting no proof of service on the defendant Crowder (and although the Clerk has not defaulted Crowder), the plaintiff moves for a default judgment against the other defendants, each of whom is in default. The plaintiff's motion (Doc. 18) is DENIED as premature and DENIED for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(a), which requires a motion to include a memorandum of legal authority in support of the request.

Additionally, to the extent the plaintiff requests the award of an attorney's fee, the affidavit attached to the motion utterly fails to meet the plaintiff's burden to establish the reasonableness of the requested fee. See Duckworth v. Whisenant, 97 F.3d 1393, 1396 (11th Cir. 1996) ("The party who applies for attorney's fees is responsible for submitting satisfactory evidence to establish both that the requested rate is in accord with the prevailing market rate and that the hours are reasonable.").

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

MMA CAPITAL CORPORATION v. CROWDER

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Apr 21, 2010
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-2392-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2010)
Case details for

MMA CAPITAL CORPORATION v. CROWDER

Case Details

Full title:MMA CAPITAL CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. ROBERT A. CROWDER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2010

Citations

CASE NO: 8:09-cv-2392-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2010)