From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MM v. RK

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Feb 28, 2023
No. 364687 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

364687

02-28-2023

MM v. RK


LC No. 14-002256-PP

ORDER

Elizabeth L. Gleicher, Chief Judge, acting under MCR 7.203(F)(1), orders:

The motion to waive fees is GRANTED for this case only.

The claim of appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The January 10, 2023 order denying reconsideration is not a final order appealable by right. MCR 3.709(B)(1). See also Nye v Gable, Nelson &Murphy, 169 Mich.App. 411, 415; 425 N.W.2d 797 (1988). To the extent that appellant is attempting to appeal the December 19, 2022 order denying the petition for leave to file a petition to terminate personal protection order, that order is also not appealable by right. MCR 3.709(B)(1).

Further, in docket nos. 357758, 357759, and 357760, this Court recognized and sanctioned appellant for habitually and persistently filing appeals without a reasonable basis for belief that there was a meritorious issue to be determined. Nevertheless, appellant filed this vexatious appeal. Therefore, on its own motion pursuant to MCR 7.216(A)(7) and (C)(1), the Court orders appellant to pay $500 in costs for filing a vexatious appeal. The clerk is directed to reject any new appeals filed by or on behalf of Rola Kolailat in any non-criminal matter until the costs required by this order are paid in full to the Court.


Summaries of

MM v. RK

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Feb 28, 2023
No. 364687 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

MM v. RK

Case Details

Full title:MM v. RK

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

No. 364687 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2023)