Opinion
March, 1931.
Present — Dowling, P.J., McAvoy, Martin, O'Malley and Sherman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the refusal of the court to charge, to which exception was taken, to the effect that if the jury should find that the hole in the door was the proximate cause of the injury, the plaintiffs could recover, was error.