From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ML-CFC 2007-6 P.R. Props. v. BPP Retail Props. (In re Subpoenas issued to DW Partners)

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
21 Misc. 753 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)

Opinion

21 Misc. 753 (AT)

05-24-2022

IN RE: SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO DW PARTNERS, LP; ROBERT CLARK; IAN KRAUS; AND DAVID WARREN v. BPP Retail Properties, LLC, Respondent. regarding the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico case of


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE:

On September 22, 2021, Petitioner initiated this miscellaneous action to quash a subpoena served in ML-CFC 2007-6 Puerto Rico, LLC v. BPP Retail Properties, LLC, No. 17 Civ. 1199, currently pending before the Honorable Raul M. Arias-Marxuach in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, motions to quash a subpoena are brought in the district where compliance is required. Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(d)(3). “When the coin! where compliance is required did not issue the subpoena, it may transfer a motion under this rule to the issuing coin! if the person subject to the subpoena consents or if the court finds exceptional circumstances.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(f). Transfer may be warranted in order to avoid disrupting the issuing court's management of the underlying litigation, as when the underlying case is in an advanced stage of discovery. SBA Commc'ns Corp. v. Fractus, S.A., No. 19 Misc. 130, 2019 WL 4879333, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2019). Transfer may also be appropriate when the underlying case is complex and knowledge of the underlying case would be helpful in resolving the motion to compel. Stanziale v. Pepper Hamilton LLP. No. M8-85, 2007 WL 473703, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2007).

The deadline for depositions of fact witnesses in the underlying case was November 1, 2021, and the parties in that action have engaged in extensive motion practice with regard to various discovery-related disputes. See ML-CFC 2007-6 Puerto Rico, No. 17 Civ. 1199, ECF No. 629 (September 17, 2021). In the interest of judicial economy, this matter would be best handled by Chief Judge Arias-Marxuach, who has significant background knowledge of the underlying case that this Court does not possess. Exceptional circumstances, including the risk of inconsistent rulings, the complexity of the underlying case, and the interests of judicial economy outweigh any interest Petitioner might have in litigating this motion locally.

Accordingly, this case is TRANFERRED to Chief Judge Arias-Marxuach in the District of Puerto Rico. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ML-CFC 2007-6 P.R. Props. v. BPP Retail Props. (In re Subpoenas issued to DW Partners)

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
21 Misc. 753 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)
Case details for

ML-CFC 2007-6 P.R. Props. v. BPP Retail Props. (In re Subpoenas issued to DW Partners)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO DW PARTNERS, LP; ROBERT CLARK; IAN KRAUS; AND…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 24, 2022

Citations

21 Misc. 753 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)