Opinion
22 CV 2606 (VB)
06-23-2022
M&K IMPORTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. REJUVENADA MEDICAL GROUP, INC., d/b/a REGENEVADA; THOM E. LOBE; PATRICK D. CROCKER; and CROCKER LAW FIRM PLLC a/k/a CROCKER & CROCKER, Defendants.
ORDER
Vincent L. Briccetti, United States District Judge.
On June 22, 2022, defendants Rejuveneda Medical Group, Inc., and Thom E. Lobe (the “Regen Defendants”), filed a partial motion to dismiss. (Doc. #34).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, by no later than July 1, 2022, plaintiff must notify the Court by letter whether it (i) intends to file an amended complaint in response to the partial motion to dismiss, or (ii) will rely on the complaint that is the subject of the motion to dismiss.
If plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint, the motion will proceed in the regular course, and the Court is unlikely to grant plaintiff a further opportunity to amend to address the purported deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed arguments in the Regen Defendants' motion. See Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Sec., LLC, 797 F.3d 160, 190 (2d Cir. 2015) (leaving “unaltered the grounds on which denial of leave to amend has long been held proper, such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, and futility”); accord F5 Cap. v. Pappas, 856 F.3d 61, 89-90 (2d Cir. 2017). The time to file opposing and reply papers shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
If plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, it must file the amended complaint by no later than 14 days after notifying the Court of its intent to do so. Within 21 days of such amendment, defendants may either: (i) file an answer to the amended complaint; (ii) file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint; or (iii) in the case of the Regen Defendants, notify the Court by letter that they are relying on the initially filed motion to dismiss.
SO ORDERED: