From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mizzoni v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 9, 2012
3:11-cv-00632-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00632-LRH-WGC

11-09-2012

JOSEPH L. MIZZONI, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA BROOKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#41) entered on September 19, 2012, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#16) filed on April 6, 2012. Plaintiff filed his Motion to Respond by a (sic) Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#44) on October 1, 2012. Defendants did not file a response. This action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#41) entered on September 19, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#41) entered on September 19, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#16) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mizzoni v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 9, 2012
3:11-cv-00632-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Mizzoni v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH L. MIZZONI, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA BROOKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00632-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2012)