From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mizutani v. Saul

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 7, 2021
CV 20-11156-CJC (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-11156-CJC (JPR)

06-07-2021

Terri Mizutanis v. Andrew Saul


PRESENT: HON. JEAN P. ROSENBLUTH, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On December 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this Social Security action. On January 4, 2021, the Court issued a case-management order, requiring Plaintiff to properly and timely serve the summons and Complaint on the Commissioner and file proof of service. Plaintiff filed a proof of service on January 15.

The time for Defendant to answer the Complaint has now passed, and he has not challenged service in any way or otherwise responded to the Complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(2), (b). Any such objection may therefore be waived. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h). But nor has Plaintiff moved for entry of default. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a).

Accordingly, Plaintiff must move for entry of default within 10 days of the date of this order or show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If she does neither, the action will likely be dismissed. Within 30 days of any entry of default, Plaintiff must move for default judgment or, again, this action will likely be dismissed for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Mizutani v. Saul

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 7, 2021
CV 20-11156-CJC (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Mizutani v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:Terri Mizutanis v. Andrew Saul

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 7, 2021

Citations

CV 20-11156-CJC (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)