From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mizell v. Mulvihill

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Jun 28, 1960
162 A.2d 288 (D.C. 1960)

Opinion

No. 2566.

Argued May 9, 1960.

Decided June 28, 1960.

APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL DIVISION; CATHERINE B. KELLY, JUDGE.

William Bogen, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.


This controversy involved a fence dividing the respective property of the litigants. It had been erected some years ago at appellee's expense. Appellant maliciously and without justification destroyed one section of the fence, thereby causing another section to collapse. The court entered a finding for appellee. The only question of any substance before us on this appeal is the amount of damages awarded. We have carefully considered the entire record, and in view of appellant's wrongful act, we cannot say that the damages were excessive.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mizell v. Mulvihill

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Jun 28, 1960
162 A.2d 288 (D.C. 1960)
Case details for

Mizell v. Mulvihill

Case Details

Full title:Katie Thomas MIZELL, Appellant, v. Margaret MULVIHILL, Appellee

Court:Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Date published: Jun 28, 1960

Citations

162 A.2d 288 (D.C. 1960)