From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mize v. Herrick

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 30, 2012
475 F. App'x 901 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6543

08-30-2012

BOYD MIZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN M. HERRICK, Acting Director; DOCTOR MILITANA, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

Boyd Mize, Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Kurzmann Tysinger, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01124-GBL-TRJ) Before AGEE, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Boyd Mize, Appellant Pro Se. Allyson Kurzmann Tysinger, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Boyd Mize appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mize v. Herrick, No. 1:10-cv-01124-GBL-TRJ (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mize v. Herrick

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 30, 2012
475 F. App'x 901 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Mize v. Herrick

Case Details

Full title:BOYD MIZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN M. HERRICK, Acting Director…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

475 F. App'x 901 (4th Cir. 2012)