From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mize v. Crouse

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 8, 1964
338 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 7839.

December 8, 1964.

James F. Fellingham, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant.

Richard H. Seaton, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Kansas (William M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen. of Kansas, on brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and SETH, Circuit Judges.


It appears from the record and briefs that the matters complained of in this habeas corpus proceedings are within the cognizance of the Kansas courts, and that the petitioner is now pursuing his remedy there. See: Per Curiam order of the Supreme Court of Kansas, entered December 6, 1963. The trial Court, therefore, correctly denied the writ and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Mize v. Crouse

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 8, 1964
338 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Mize v. Crouse

Case Details

Full title:John Leonard MIZE, Appellant, v. Sherman H. CROUSE, Warden, Kansas State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 1964

Citations

338 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1964)