From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miyabara v. Sutera

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jun 1, 2023
2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW

06-01-2023

STANLEY KEITH MIYABARA, Plaintiff, v. MAYLENE SUTERA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

I. DISCUSSION

The Court's mail to Plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable. (ECF Nos. 11). Pursuant to Nevada Local Rule of Practice IA 3-1, a “pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.” LR IA 3-1. This Court grants Plaintiff 30 days from the date of entry of this order to file his updated address with this Court. If Plaintiff does not update the Court with his current address within 30 days from the date of entry of this order, this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice.

II. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an updated address with the Clerk of the Court within 30 days from the date of entry of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice.


Summaries of

Miyabara v. Sutera

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jun 1, 2023
2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Miyabara v. Sutera

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY KEITH MIYABARA, Plaintiff, v. MAYLENE SUTERA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jun 1, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2023)