From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miyabara v. Sutera

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 20, 2023
2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW

04-20-2023

Stanley Keith Miyabara, Plaintiff, v. Maylene Sutera, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court previously screened Plaintiff's complaint, dismissed Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice, and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint (if he so chose). See ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was given until March 24, 2023 to amend his complaint. Id. at 3. The Court advised Plaintiff that if he did not file an amended complaint by this date, the Court would recommend that this case be dismissed. Id. Since this order, Plaintiff has not filed anything in his case. Accordingly, he appears to have abandoned his case.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice and this case closed.

NOTICE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this Report and Recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within 14 days of being served with it. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Miyabara v. Sutera

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 20, 2023
2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Miyabara v. Sutera

Case Details

Full title:Stanley Keith Miyabara, Plaintiff, v. Maylene Sutera, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 20, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02180-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 20, 2023)