Summary
dismissing a plaintiff's complaint when an M&R concluded that her complaint failed to satisfy established pleading standards and, "rather than directing the court to a specific error in the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations, plaintiff merely recite[d] new allegations that are in her proposed amended complaint."
Summary of this case from Source.Auction, LLC v. FarkasOpinion
No. 11-2259
05-30-2012
MARY ROSLYN MIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant - Appellee.
Mary Roslyn Mixon, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Crosby, Stacy Kaplan Wood, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:11-cv-00228-MOC-DSC) Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Roslyn Mixon, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Crosby, Stacy Kaplan Wood, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mary Roslyn Mixon appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting the Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mixon v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schs., No. 3:11-cv-00228-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED