From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mixon v. Bronson Health Care Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 31, 2015
Case No.: 1:14-cv-330 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2015)

Summary

holding that a mother lacked standing to bring an EMTALA claim based on emotional distress damages she sustained from the loss of her son

Summary of this case from Palmer v. Shawnee Mission Med. Ctr., Inc.

Opinion

Case No.: 1:14-cv-330

03-31-2015

KETURAH MIXON, Plaintiff, v. BRONSON HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC. Et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody in this action (ECF No. 26). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed.

ACCORDINGLY, the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants are DISMISSED. Dated: March 31, 2015

/s/ Paul L. Maloney

Paul L. Maloney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mixon v. Bronson Health Care Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 31, 2015
Case No.: 1:14-cv-330 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2015)

holding that a mother lacked standing to bring an EMTALA claim based on emotional distress damages she sustained from the loss of her son

Summary of this case from Palmer v. Shawnee Mission Med. Ctr., Inc.
Case details for

Mixon v. Bronson Health Care Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KETURAH MIXON, Plaintiff, v. BRONSON HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC. Et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 1:14-cv-330 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2015)

Citing Cases

Palmer v. Shawnee Mission Med. Ctr., Inc.

]" 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(d)(2). Several district courts have interpreted the statute's use of the term "any…