From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MITX v. GORDON S. SWIFT CONS ENGR

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 21, 2006
No. 02-06-225-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 21, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-06-225-CV

Delivered: September 21, 2006.

Appeal from the 236th District Court of Tarrant County.

Panel D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered "Appellants' Amended Notice Of Dismissal Of Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.


Summaries of

MITX v. GORDON S. SWIFT CONS ENGR

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 21, 2006
No. 02-06-225-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 21, 2006)
Case details for

MITX v. GORDON S. SWIFT CONS ENGR

Case Details

Full title:MITX, LTD., WHITE RENO INVESTORS, LTD., AND WELLS RENO INVESTORS, LTD.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 21, 2006

Citations

No. 02-06-225-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 21, 2006)

Citing Cases

Drainage Dist. v. Givens

This is always true where valid objections are defined by the statute itself. Bliss on Code Pleading, Sec.…