From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mittman v. Mittman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1969
248 N.E.2d 593 (N.Y. 1969)

Opinion

Submitted February 25, 1969

Decided April 9, 1969

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LOUIS B. HELLER, J.

Morris Berler for appellant-respondent.

Louis A. Breslerman for respondent-appellant.


Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: A close reading of the record establishes that the judgment, as modified by the Appellate Division, was correct and just. Consequently, and because the issues arise in a particularly embittered matrimonial litigation, no useful purpose would be served in directing a new trial with only the same result as a likely outcome. Hence, the trial issues raised by plaintiff-respondent-appellant, which would not or should not affect the result, must be disregarded.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.


Summaries of

Mittman v. Mittman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1969
248 N.E.2d 593 (N.Y. 1969)
Case details for

Mittman v. Mittman

Case Details

Full title:JEAN MITTMAN, Respondent-Appellant, v. MEYER S. MITTMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 9, 1969

Citations

248 N.E.2d 593 (N.Y. 1969)
248 N.E.2d 593
300 N.Y.S.2d 842

Citing Cases

Poersch v. Eldridge

( Beaver v. Beaver, 117 N.Y. 421; Russo v. Russo, 17 A.D.2d 129.) The enactment of the Banking Law effected a…

Neubauer v. Neubauer

Certainly, under these circumstances, a second oral hearing was not required. Finally, in light of the…