From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mittelstadt v. Granger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1952
279 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

March 31, 1952.


In an action against stockbrokers by a customer, to recover corporate bonds or the value thereof, the order on appeal denies appellants' motion, under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds of a bar by the Statute of Limitations, a general release, and res judicata; denies their alternative motion, under rule 103, to strike certain paragraphs from the amended complaint on the same grounds, and as sham and frivolous; and grants leave to appellants to assert their contentions by way of affirmative defenses. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1024.]


Summaries of

Mittelstadt v. Granger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1952
279 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Mittelstadt v. Granger

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED MITTELSTADT, Respondent, v. JEFFREY S. GRANGER et al., Individually…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 943 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)