From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitnick v. Furniture Workers', c., C.I.O

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 10, 1939
4 A.2d 277 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued February term, 1939.

Decided February 10th, 1939.

The parties having settled their differences, the appeal is dismissed to the end that a motion may be made in the court of chancery to dismiss the bill of complaint.

On appeal from the court of chancery.

Mr. Solomon Golat and Mr. Herman Marx, for the defendants-appellants.

Mr. Seymour J. Solomon, for the complainant-respondent.


The parties have settled their differences, the appeal is dismissed to the end that a motion may be made in the court of chancery to dismiss the bill of complaint.

We are not to be understood as expressing any view with respect to the opinion filed in the cause by the learned vice-chancellor who granted the preliminary injunction appealed from.

For dismissal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 15.


Summaries of

Mitnick v. Furniture Workers', c., C.I.O

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 10, 1939
4 A.2d 277 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Mitnick v. Furniture Workers', c., C.I.O

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD MITNICK, individually and trading as Metropolitan Upholstery Co.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 10, 1939

Citations

4 A.2d 277 (N.J. 1939)
4 A.2d 277

Citing Cases

Dolan Dining v. Cooks'

Had either counsel called this fact to that court's attention the appeal would probably have been dismissed.…